Dana Air Claims Bird Strike Cause for MD-83 Crash, Others Disagree

The Dana Air MD-83 when Alaska Airlines owned it. Reports suggest the airliner may not have been airworthy
Aircraft Had an Alledged History of Problems
Officials from Dana Air have come out and hinted that a bird strike could be the cause of the ill-fated Flight 992 that crashed near Lagos Airport in Nigeria.
Dana Air Director of Flight, Captain Oscar Wason, speaking on Sliver Bird Television in Lagos, stated the following:
“I don’t know what could have been responsible for the crash, but this morning we found remnants of birds in one of the engines,” he added. “We have bird strikes and it might have been that a mass of birds went through the engine and caused it to lose power.”
But others are saying the airline is being less than honest, and that the aircraft suffered a multitude of issues leading up to the disaster:
‘Though Bird strike is a plausible explanation, the quality of Dana Air plane is fueling yet another speculation that the crash occurred because the plane was faulty a theory Dana Air is vehemently denying. However, the plane’s history does not look good. The Twin-Engined McDonnell Douglas MD-83 was purchased new by Alaska Airlines in 1990. Alaska Air then sold the Aircraft to North Shore Aircraft LLC in May 2007 in order to fly a fuel-efficient Boeing 737s but leased it back for about a year. In August 2008, the aircraft was retired from the Alaska fleet and returned to the owner.
During its service at Alaska Air the MD-83 developed a number of faults. According to public records, it is known that the aircraft experienced a mechanical fault and the crew made an emergency diversion due to smoke and an electrical smell in the cabin on November 4th, 2002. This was determined to have been the result of overheated light ballast. The aircraft was also involved in an evacuation following landing in Long Beach, CA (LGB) on August 20th, 2006, due to smoke in the cabin. That incident was later determined to have been the result of a chafed wire bundle that had discharged. However, Alaska Air is claiming the plane was still air worthy at time of retirement.
As of the time of purchase, the aircraft was already above the age limit allowed in Nigeria but Dana Air still went ahead to purchase it.’
A report from allAfrica.com also says a Dana official, who did not want to be indentified, claims the plane was ‘faulty’ and that Dana Air knew it:
‘The Dana official who spoke to Channels Television in Lagos, alleged that the Indian owners of the airline threw caution to the winds and insisted that the plane must fly in a bid to maximise profit, thereby sending the plane over to Abuja to pick passengers, when it should have been returned to Lagos for repair.
She also claimed that the flight has had persistent history of faults with its hydraulics in recent times and it was not supposed to have flown. According to the official, “the plane has been giving faults for a very long time. There was a case when it was on ground in Uyo for over six hours, it had a bolt. And then in Abuja it happened a few days ago. Some people went with the aircraft but they could not come back, because it had a fault there and it couldn’t leave Abuja.”‘
Category: Airnation







“As of the time of purchase, the aircraft was already above the age limit allowed in Nigeria”
Is that a joke? LOL. This plane was only 22 years old!!
Does anyone know who’s investigating the incident? I hope the NTSB is asked to get involved, since it’s an American plane at least.
Some airlines impose a limit on aircraft age but I agree, it is peculiar that they would have more ‘stringent’ limits than the US
Especially, NIGERIA?? Isn’t that where all the planes resurrected from the boneyard go?
In a word, yes. :)
LOL That’s what i thought!
The reality is that the age of a plane shouldn’t be what worries passengers- it’s how they’re maintained. Just as long as individual parts are replaced when needed, planes can theoretically fly forever!
There must have been some “issue” with this plane that was overlooked during maintenance. There’s just no way two JT8D engines can break down simultaneously- it’s unheard of! This engine has been perfected since the early 1960′s, it’s a tough engine and has proven itself for so long. There’s gotta be a common denominator that caused both engines to lose thrust. Either that, or there really were birds…
I might be wrong in this, but Dana says that it was a bird strike (or ‘likely’).
It’s very unlikely birds took out both engines on an MD-80. Maybe one, but not both…based on where the engines are positioned.
I’m wondering how often bird strikes take out engines on planes that have engines in the back rather than the wings?
My guess, very low! The only instance i’m aware of where two rear-mounted engines failed due to ingestion, was caused by ice falling off of the wing upon takeoff.
And i figured out the age limit issue with plane’s in Nigeria. Apparently the law restricts airlines from “bringing” planes into Nigeria that are older than 22 years old. However, airlines may keep planes for much longer- the only restriction has to do with the age upon registering in Nigeria. So this plane was totally legal in Nigeria…
The true cause will probably never get out…especially in a country like that. :(